Australian bitcoin advocacy association Bitcoin Australia (BA) has published a paper detailing its recommendations for how bitcoin taxation should be managed by domestic authorities.

By producing the paper, BA is preempting the Australian Tax Office (ATO), which is expected to release its own official guidelines sometime in the next few weeks.

BA's recommendations are designed to fit within the framework of existing Australian federal tax legislation, factoring for income, capital gains and a goods-and-services tax (GST). At the proposal's heart, however, is the legal definition of digital currency as 'money', which it describes as "any generally accepted medium of exchange for goods and services and for the payment of debts".

The 12-page paper, crowdsourced by local experts with the help of Australian legal firms Adroit and McCullough Robertson, all of whom worked pro bono, recommends the tax office take "the practical approach" to defining bitcoin, stating:

Bitcoin's lack of a central authority, and ability to be used and accepted universally by anyone, differentiates it from other non-cash payments such loyalty points and frequent flyer miles.

BA believes bitcoin can exist within Australian tax law's broad definition of 'money' as-is, without changing the fundamental operation of systems like the GST. Indeed, outside of its function as money, bitcoin has little reason to exist regardless of how it is defined legally.

The paper points out that bitcoin can also be considered 'property' under GST and thus an 'asset' under capital gains tax, also under existing legal precedents and definitions.

The GST, which is Australia's sales tax, taxes anything that fits its broad definition of a 'supply' (ie: goods and services). This typically does not include money to prevent the tax from being inappropriately applied twice during a single transaction. Instead, money is defined as a 'consideration', or payment, for the supply.

The potential for extra taxation of bitcoin due to a non-money definition has been an issue in other countries that have already set guidelines, namely the US and Singapore.

BA says treating a medium of exchange like bitcoin as 'supply' would drive prices up by 10% and cause Australian consumers to make their purchases overseas, rather than locally.

It has a point: a high-valued local currency and 10% GST on local purchases have already seen shoppers turn to online retailers overseas, leaving Australia-based retailers fuming.

The ATO in February made clear its intention to tax bitcoin transactions somehow, saying it would release official guidelines in time for the end of the current financial year on 30th June.

Providing some extra details in a privately addressed letter to a business owner, an ATO official said the department would tax bitcoin under income, capital gains and GST laws.

So far, however, it has not said what legal status bitcoin should have under those guidelines, leaving businesses to speculate.

Local bitcoin advocates see the tax treatment of bitcoin in much grander terms, choosing to focus on the potential economic effects Australia could face, should it eschew appropriate taxation.

Bitcoin Australia

president and co-founder of bitcoin payment gateway BitPOS, Jason Williams, said the government should be doing whatever it can to encourage economic and investment activity:

Williams continued, implying the decision could have far-reaching economic impacts:

BA's paper also describes the growth of Australia's bitcoin economy, saying it grew by 480% in the first four months of 2014, with an estimated 192 businesses and 7% of the world's investment focusing on bitcoin ventures.

The group said it is available to help and assist any government department or agency understand bitcoin further, and would welcome the opportunity.

Bitcoin Australia, also known as The Bitcoin Association of Australia, is affiliated internationally with the Bitcoin Foundation and serves as its local chapter.

Image via Mattz90 / Shutterstock