Bitfury Paper Makes Case For Auditability As Blockchain's Defining Feature

What makes a blockchain a blockchain?

AccessTimeIconNov 29, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 18, 2021 at 5:27 p.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

What makes a blockchain a blockchain?

The Bitfury Group is now weighing in with its definition of one of the more often-debated words in the FinTech sector.

  • Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
    13:18
    Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
  • Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
    05:10
    Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
  • The first video of the year 2024
    04:07
    The first video of the year 2024
  • The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
    40:07
    The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
  • As part of its recent shift toward enterprise blockchain services and consulting, Bitfury's latest research paper, entitled 'On Blockchain Accountability', takes aim at this argument, aiming to parse out the underlying innovations that make bitcoin's blockchain a "blockchain", and by extension, the features that may be necessary to label code releases as such.

    According to the paper, blockchain is best defined as the union of three distinct technologies (Byzantine fault-tolerant systems, digital time-stamping services and currency ledgers using cryptographic primitives), each of which it argues was "well studied" before the introduction of the bitcoin blockchain.

    The paper reads:

    "A blockchain is a replicated, autonomous, Byzantine fault-tolerant log with consensus based on blocks that permits external auditing and lightweight nodes, and provides non-repudiation of the log entries."

    Notably, Bitfury, one of the largest miners on the bitcoin blockchain, does not limit its definition to proof-of-work blockchains, arguing the properties of that underlie its definition could be satisfied by different means.

    Bitfury, however, goes on to assert that, at their core, blockchains must provide auditing and accountability, and that public blockchains can assist in this function (even when privacy is desired by participants).

    Another point of emphasis lies in the paper's differentiation between a blockchain and a traditional replicated log, with the paper arguing that the former technology offering a solution to "blame ascription, retrospective audits and interaction with clients" through the use of data blocks.

    Further delineation is made in new sub-definitions that aim to provide clarity and labeling to alternative blockchain designs that have emerged.

    For example, permissioned or enterprise blockchains are defined as "(atomically) consistent...with the identifiable consensus nodes", while blockchains that require a public ledger for security are called "anchor blockchains".

    The case for anchoring

    Given Bitfury's original market positioning in the public blockchain sector, its comments on the latter topic are perhaps the most noteworthy.

    However, Bitfury appeals to scientific reasoning in its report. Using the example of a newspaper, the paper argues that print mediums have historically fulfilled some of the characteristics that can now be achieved with public blockchains.

    For example, it labels the paper newspaper an "anchor" for the data included, one that is also "timestamped" and published periodically. This makes information in a newspaper, the paper contends, less susceptible to "attack" or corruption as the copies are publicly available, and cannot display "different values to different readers".

    "In order to retroactively modify the blockchain, the attacker would need to reprint all medium copies after the retroactive modification and destroy the existing ones. This could be practically infeasible or very costly for a comparatively popular printed media," it reads.

    In this light, Bitfury introduces the concept of "anchored blockchains", or a blockchain that would require a "target blockchain", like the bitcoin blockchain, to provided added security.

    The paper also studies some alternatives that could be used, including trusted hardware and blockchain-as-a-service providers, though it said these might fall short in terms of providing auditability and accountability.

    Disclosure

    Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

    CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


    Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.