85% of Italian Banks Are Exchanging Interbank Transfer Data on Corda

Banks across Italy are using R3’s Corda blockchain to vastly speed the process of double-checking transaction logs.

AccessTimeIconJul 27, 2020 at 8:00 a.m. UTC
Updated May 15, 2023 at 1:32 p.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

Banks across Italy are using R3’s Corda blockchain to vastly speed the process of double-checking transaction logs.

Silvia Attanasio, head of innovation at the Italian Banking Association (Associazione Bancaria Italiana or ABI), said both the process of interbank reconciliation and the technology underlying the exchange of data had to change.

In the old system, reconciliation took a long time and was unpredictable. The average time for reconciliation was between 30 and 50 days, Attanasio said. On Corda, reconciliation is completed within a day.

The Interbank Agreement, a part of Italian law that governs interbank transfers, was passed in 1978 and describes a process of banks sending physical tapes. Once the interbank agreement was updated in May 2019 to include data standardization, Italy set a window between March 1 and Oct. 1, 2020, for integration to that standard and a blockchain banks could use to follow the new rules.

Information technology company NTT Data designed the network and bank technology company SIA operates it.

The project is in phase two with around 85% of Italian banks, or 55 banks total, using the platform to share interbank transfer data. In the third and final phase slated for October, the association expects to have 70 to 100 banks on the platform. 

“The benefit is related to the new standardization more than the technology itself,” Attanasio said. “It’s like the rhythm you set on your metronome that sets a [faster] timeline.”

Blockchain benefits

Before Spunta, each bank had its own software for exchanging data related to interbank transfers, said Demetrio Migliorati, head of blockchain at Banca Mediolanum.

Using Corda for data exchanges between banks was also lower-stakes than moving fiat between banks on a blockchain.

“If we failed in this process, the worst thing that could happen was to have a problem in the information exchange between banks,” Attanasio said. “Clients are not affected, the companies are not affected. It was a natural sandbox.”

The association did consider a centralized database as opposed to Corda but wasn’t open to having banks keep data on separate ledgers at each bank.

Experimenting with something small like data exchange between banks also allows Italian banks to experiment with other use cases. Some banks have begun experimenting with sharing know-your-customer (KYC) information and guarantees of credit on Spunta.

“If we want to do something new for Spunta, we change it immediately and it is changed for all banks,” said Migliorati. 

Disclosure

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.



Read more about