GAW Miners CEO Held Liable for $9.8 Million Judgment in SEC Case

A US federal judge has signed off on a final judgment against GAW Miners CEO Homero Josh Garza.

AccessTimeIconOct 4, 2017 at 10:24 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 18, 2021 at 7:06 p.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

A US federal judge has signed off on a final judgment against Homero Josh Garza, the CEO of the now-defunct cryptocurrency mining firm GAW Miners.

The judgment, entered on October 4, comes less than two years after the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) first filed suit against Garza, GAW Miners and ZenMiner, a related firm. Garza was accused and charged with violating securities laws through the offering of so-called "Hashlets," or "virtual miners" which were sold to customers through an internal exchange.

  • Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
    13:18
    Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
  • Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
    05:10
    Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
  • The first video of the year 2024
    04:07
    The first video of the year 2024
  • The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
    40:07
    The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
  • Today's judgment follows a guilty plea from Garza, given in July, in a related criminal case pursued by the U.S. Justice Department. Garza plead guilty to a single wire fraud charge and faces sentencing early next year.

    In the SEC's civil case, Garza has been held liable for $9,182,000, an amount that the court order said will be "deemed satisfied by the order of restitution that will be entered against him when he is sentenced in the related criminal case." It comes after the agency won a default judgment against GAW Miners and ZenMiner for $11 million in disgorged profits and civil penalties.

    GAW Miners, prior to its collapse, previously offered hosted mining services. It later moved into the cloud mining business, through which customers can purchase hash power generated by hardware owned by the miner. But in the case of GAW, the firm didn't actually possess as much hash power as it sold – prompting a harsh rebuke from federal prosecutors in their original complaint from December 2015.

    "Though cloaked in technological sophistication and jargon, defendants' fraud was simple at its core – defendants sold what they did not own, and misrepresented the nature of what they were selling," they wrote at the time.

    Image via Shutterstock

    44-1 by CoinDesk on Scribd

    Disclosure

    Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

    CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


    Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.