Bitcoin in the Headlines: Blockchain Good, Bitcoin Bad
The coverage over the last few days has been largely dominated by the partnership between nine well-known banks and distributed ledger startup R3CEV.
Sep 18, 2015 at 2:45 p.m. UTC
:format(webp)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindeskuat/HXFZFP7Q4NF6BBTVLSXSP3A4GU.jpg)
Bitcoin in the Headlines is a weekly analysis of bitcoin media coverage and its impact.
The bitcoin and blockchain industry have a new major newsmaker: distributed ledger startup R3CEV.
Leaving behind a week filled with impressive funding rounds, the coverage over the last few days has been largely dominated by the company's partnership with nine well-known banks including JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs.
Journalists from across the world jumped at the chance to cover the news – perhaps still a sign that mainstream media will deem industry events newsworthy if traditional finance is involved.
In stark contrast, more negative news events received less attention, and were far more focused on the other half of the blockchain – bitcoin, the digital token for which the blockchain acts as a ledger.
BitPay's phishing attack – which resulted in the loss of $1.8m – received less widespread, but more derisive coverage. Elsewhere, reports about Mt Gox CEO Mark Karpeles' charge with embezzlement carried over from last week.
R3CEV's big score
The news that nine of the world's biggest banks had partnered with distributed ledger startup R3CEV caught the attention of the Financial Times' Philip Stafford, who began his piece emphasizing the group's intention to drive the adoption of blockchain technology.
Stafford wrote:
Stafford continued to note that the blockchain, which he described as bitcoin's underlying "computer network", had caught the eye of the financial services industry in the past six months for "its potential to overhaul the sprawling and complicated network of bank payments and settlements".
Interestingly, the journalist's assertions follow on from Blythe Masters' comments during a panel at Consensus 2015 – CoinDesk's inaugural conference held in New York last week – where she noted how distributed ledger technologies could serve to eradicate the pain points affecting the financial industry and its ecosystem.
The article, which then went on to give an overview of the financial industry's interaction with blockchain technology, also noted:
"Banks, exchanges and settlement houses are exploring ways to harness the much-hyped technology to reshape many of their daily operations, from upgrading old back-office systems and outsourcing billions of dollars in costs to automatic execution of contracts."
Efforts from Wall Street
The Wall Street Journal's Paul Vigna was also quick to point out Wall Street's increasing interest in blockchain technology:
Examples cited by Vigna included Blythe Masters' appointment as CEO of Digital Asset Holdings and itBit's plans to reveal its own distributed ledger, BankChain.
Likewise, Russia Today, ran a piece titled "Global banking giants join forces to make bitcoin technology mainstream".
Unlike the FT's piece, which was characterised by an absence of any notable bitcoin mentions, the outletonly indulged in a brief, negative overview of bitcoin:
It continued: "Not having a central authority means that an Internet-wide catastrophe would have to occur in order to compromise the integrity of the ledger."
Although its description was not factually inaccurate, the report failed to move away from the negative connotations associated with the cryptocurrency.
The BBC also referred to bitcoin in its coverage, noting its somewhat negative reputation whilst outlining some of the vulnerabilities of companies in the space:
Further proof that blockchain technology continues to captivate mainstream institutions was provided by IBM's announcement that it is working on a new blockchain-based smart contract system.
Bitcoin as a commodity
Bloomberg's Luke Kawa was one of the journalists who reported the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) ruling that bitcoin met its definition of a commodity, a decision that speaks to how the agency will likely regulate the technology in the future.
"Virtual money is officially a commodity, just like crude oil or wheat," said Kawa.
As noted by commentators, the CFTC's decision is specific to the agency only, meaning other agencies are still able to come to decisions regarding how uses of the technology may fall under their jurisdiction.
Still, there was widespread confusion about the implications of the announcement.
Writing for ZDNet, Corinne Reichert incorrectly suggested that the move would more broadly affect bitcoin companies not involved in the sale of options, futures or derivatives, implying they must now ensure that their companies are legally registered with the CFTC.
Reichert added:
The ruling more specifically relates to issuers of bitcoin futures contracts seeking to find a market with industry companies looking to hedge against the fluctuating price of the asset.
As stated in past analysis on CoinDesk, the CFTC has the power not to regulate commodities themselves, but to regulate commodities futures and other similar financial contracts.
Embezzlement and Phishing
Negative news drew less attention this week, but most was focused on older startups seeking to use bitcoin as a digital currency.
For example, Motherboard ran a piece about BitPay's phishing attack, titled "How a Clever Hacker Tricked a Major Bitcoin Company Out of $1.8 Million".
The piece said:
The hack, the author added, was never made public by bitcoin payment processor BitPay, but was revealed by court documents which the startup filed against an insurer.
The story that was picked up by a variety of news outlets including American Banker and the Atlanta Business Chronicle, but was largely bypassed by more major media outlets.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW
:format(webp)/downloads.coindesk.com/arc/failsafe/user/1x1.png)