Research Examines Compatibility of Public and Private Blockchains

Permissioned and permissionless blockchains are compatible according to Bitfury's latest research.

AccessTimeIconOct 22, 2015 at 7:02 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 18, 2021 at 4:18 p.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

While distributed ledger technology continues to gain momentum among the world's financial institutions, the potential and viability of bitcoin is still being largely dismissed by the same parties.

Avid bitcoin supporters believe that using a private blockchain would inevitably result in a centralised system – a world away from bitcoin's decentralised, trustless protocol.

  • Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
    13:18
    Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
  • Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
    05:10
    Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
  • The first video of the year 2024
    04:07
    The first video of the year 2024
  • The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
    40:07
    The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
  • However, according to bitcoin mining firm BitFury's latest white paper – written in collaboration with developer Jeff Garzik – permissioned and permissionless blockchains are compatible and can be interconnected.

    Many permissioned blockchain applications, the paper says, can be layered on top of permissionless blockchains using existing technology.

    For example, coloured coins – a concept designed to be layered on top of bitcoin's blockchain which aims to ease the transfer of assets – could make public ledgers useful for financial institutions.

    The paper adds:

    "Similar protocols could enable timestamping documents, assisting in development of decentralised timestamped registries."

    "Payment channel networks could streamline payments by creating a scalable peer-to-peer layer on top of permissionless blockchains," it continues. "Sidechain technology could be used to integrate permissionless and permissioned blockchains into a single interconnected environment."

    Permission vs permissionless

    Although the paper says that private, permissioned blockchains could hold the key for blockchain innovation in the short run, it notes that public permissionless ledgers are less vulnerable to attacks.

    This, the paper notes, is due to the design of permissionless ledgers, which are based on the assumption that transaction participants do not have to trust each other.

    It concludes:

    "Permissionless chains minimise human factor and emphasise the algorithmic approach to security and data consistency, which are core aspects of blockchain technology. Therefore, permissionless chains could reasonably become a base layer of blockchain infrastructure, while permissioned applications could be built on top of it."

    Jigsaw image via Shutterstock.

    Disclosure

    Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

    CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


    Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.