More Consortia? Banks See Model as Vital to DLT Efforts

Nearly three-quarters of banks and asset managers see the consortium model as necessary for exploring distributed ledger tech, a survey reveals.

AccessTimeIconApr 14, 2017 at 12:00 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 18, 2021 at 6:01 p.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

Nearly three-quarters of banks and asset managers see the consortium model as necessary for exploring distributed ledger tech, according to a new survey released last week.

For the survey, international law firm Simmons & Simmons polled 200 C-suite representatives as part of a larger exploration of how they view financial technology opportunities. Notably, while most were positive about the consortium model, there were hints that there may be some weaknesses to the approach.

  • Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
    13:18
    Bitcoin Mining in the U.S. Will Become 'a Lot More Decentralized': Core Scientific CEO
  • Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
    05:10
    Binance to Discontinue Its Nigerian Naira Services After Government Scrutiny
  • The first video of the year 2024
    04:07
    The first video of the year 2024
  • The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
    40:07
    The last regression video of the year 3.67.0
  • For example, 60% reported some existing consortia have too many participants, while 68% expressed a desire to have more control over the work ongoing in these groups.

    Further, 40% reported a belief that joining an industry consortium could have a negative effect on their firm's competitive advantage, with 38% asserting that they'd rather focus on internal solutions to new technology challenges.

    Yet, report author Angus McLean also noted the operational difficulties inherent in this sentiment, given that it's widely believed blockchain and distributed ledger systems require a network effect to reduce costs and offer benefits.

    McLean wrote:

    "For distributed ledger-based solutions, for example, there is little point in having systems that work for only a small segment of the industry. The value is generated by enabling a network effect."

    In this way, the report cited the work unveiled last year by Utility Settlement Coin – a project UBS, Deutsche Bank, Santander, BNY Mellon and ICAP made public last year – as an example of a consortium it believes may be the right size in the current climate.

    Still, the survey provides an interesting glimpse into the sentiment among banks participating in consortia efforts, perhaps shedding light on the future challenges to the model.

    Businessmen image via Shutterstock

    Disclosure

    Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

    CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


    Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.



    Read more about