Coindesk Logo

Crypto Startup Files Petition Against India's Central Bank Ban

Crypto Startup Files Petition Against India's Central Bank Ban

Crypto Startup Files Petition Against India's Central Bank Ban

An Indian startup is taking the country's central bank to court over its decision to bar banks from dealing with crypto businesses.

An Indian startup is taking the country's central bank to court over its decision to bar banks from dealing with crypto businesses.

An Indian startup is taking the country's central bank to court over its decision to bar banks from dealing with crypto businesses.

AccessTimeIconApr 18, 2018, 2:00 AM
Updated Aug 18, 2021, 8:50 PM

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

An Indian startup planning to launch a crypto exchange has filed a complaint against the Reserve Bank of India's (RBI) decision to bar banks from engaging with crypto services.

Kali Digital Ecosystems filed a writ petition with the High Court of Delhi on Tuesday against the RBI, the Ministry of Finance and the Goods and Services Tax Council (GST Council) seeking "an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the circular" which it describes as "arbitrary and unconstitutional."

The company initially planned to launch its crypto exchange, CoinRecoil, in August 2018, and said in the petition that it has "undertaken substantial investment in this regard." However, the company now says it will be unable to operate due to the restrictions on banking services imposed by the RBI earlier this month, as previously reported.

The petition reads:

"On account of the Impugned Circular, the Petitioner will not be able to avail banking services to operate the cryptocurrency exchange 'CoinRecoil.' Such banking services are imperative for the business of the Petitioner. Consequently, the business of the Petitioner is stillborn on account of the Impugned Circular."

Kali Digital Ecosystems specifically states that RBI's move violates the firm's constitutional right to practice any profession, trade or business.

It also argues that RBI's decision constitutes discrimination under the Constitution, because it gives crypto services "differential treatment" without justification.

This lack of justification, the company contends, stems from the failure of RBI to adequately define the scope of the term "cryptocurrency." Because of this ambiguity, the term has sometimes been wrongly applied to rewards programs, like airline miles.

Likewise, the company adds that the GST Council has created "uncertainty" by neglecting to put forth crypto-specific tax laws, and is "adversely affecting" its business as a result. It appeals to the court to correct this by directing the Council to "frame appropriate regulation on cryptocurrencies."

RBI's circular was preceeded by two warnings on cryptocurrencies, issued in 2013 and 2017 respectively. Despite its strict stance on cryptocurrencies, the Bank revealed in the circular that it is exploring the idea of issuing its own digital currency.

Bitcoin with rupee banknotes image via Shutterstock

Disclosure

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.


Learn more about Consensus 2024, CoinDesk's longest-running and most influential event that brings together all sides of crypto, blockchain and Web3. Head to consensus.coindesk.com to register and buy your pass now.