US Judge Sides With CFTC in Fraud Case, Ruling Cryptos Are Commodities
A U.S. judge has sided with the Commodity and Futures Trading Commission in a fraud lawsuit, ruling cryptocurrencies are commodities.
Sep 27, 2018 at 12:01 p.m. UTC
:format(webp)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/coindeskuat/K2CAUFOBMVGTLJSDF72N5R5Z6A.jpg)
A U.S. judge has sided with the Commodity and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) in a lawsuit involving an allegedly fraudulent crypto investment scheme, ruling that the cryptocurrencies involved are commodities for the purpose of the case.
As CoinDesk reported at the time, the CFTC charged two individuals and a Las Vegas-based business called My Big Coin Pay over the alleged cryptocurrency-related scam back in January.
The commission accused the pair, Randall Crater and Mark Gillespie, as well as the firm, of taking customer funds and siphoning that money into their personal accounts. Additionally, they allegedly used those funds "for personal expenses and the purchase of luxury goods."
Subsequently, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that the cryptos involved are not commodities and, as such, the CFTC has no jurisdiction over the case.
However, Judge Rya W. Zobel from the district court of Massachusetts has now agreed with the counterarguments made by the CFTC and denied the motion to dismiss on Wednesday. As a result, the case will continue.
The defendants contended that My Big Coin – which Crater and Gillespie marketed as a cryptocurrency that can be mined and traded – did not deal with any "contracts for future delivery." Therefore, it's not a commodity under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), the two argued.
However, the CFTC refuted that contention, stating:
"Pointing to the existence of bitcoin futures contracts, [the CFTC] argues that contracts for future delivery of virtual currencies are 'dealt in' and that My Big Coin, as a virtual currency, is therefore a commodity," the CFTC continued.
"The text of the statute supports plaintiff's argument. The Act defines 'commodity' generally and categorically, 'not by type, grade, quality, brand, producer, manufacturer, or form,'" the Judge wrote.
The decision is the latest instance in which cryptocurrencies involved in an alleged fraud lawsuit have been determined by a U.S. judge to be commodities that are subject to the jurisdiction of the CFTC.
CoinDesk reported in March that another U.S district judge also backed the financial watchdog and made a similar decision in a fraud lawsuit concerning a firm called CabbageTech.
The court later ruled in favor of the regulators, finding that CabbageTech and its proprietor, Patrick McDonnell, had been running a fraudulent operation and imposing a $1 million fine in penalties and restitution, Bloomberg reported.
My Big Coin by CoinDesk on Scribd
:format(webp)/downloads.coindesk.com/arc/failsafe/user/1x1.png)