The 51% Attack Nightmare Scenario (Isn't That Bad)

An accessible, in-depth look at what's really at risk when Proof-of-Work or Proof-of-Stake blockchains suffer the dreaded 51% attack.

AccessTimeIconSep 27, 2020 at 7:00 p.m. UTC
Updated Aug 19, 2021 at 4:35 a.m. UTC

Presented By Icon

Election 2024 coverage presented by

Stand with crypto

On this Speaking of Bitcoin episode, join hosts Adam B. Levine, Andreas M. Antonopoulos, Stephanie Murphy and Jonathan Mohan for an in-depth discussion about what's really at risk when blockchains suffer the dreaded 51% attack.

For more episodes and free early access before our regular releases, subscribe with Apple PodcastsSpotifyPocketcastsGoogle PodcastsCastboxStitcherRadioPublicaiHeartRadio or RSS.

This episode is sponsored by Crypto.comBitstamp and Nexo.io.

On today's show we're talking 51% attacks, the much discussed, infrequently seen and fairly misunderstood doomsday scenarios. It's a topic of discussion that's recently re-emerged as Ethereum plans its transition to Proof-of-Stake and after fork Ethereum Classic was hit by its third in less than a month.

Although the numbers may change, basically any blockchain you can imagine is vulnerable to some form of the so-called 51% attack. By distributing the power within a protocol, say to miners instead of a corporate board, blockchains and other decentralized systems create and maintain a "Consensus Reality" where what most of the network believes to be true is true, or becomes true for the entirety of the network.

If you think about it, this makes sense.  Each blockchain creates a game with a distinct set of rules that need to be followed for the thing to work. It requires lots of people who don't know each other to individually follow those rules and get rewarded by the system for doing so.  The assumption underlying all of these systems is that most of the people are going to be compelled by the offered rewards to follow the rules. Even if a lot of people aren't following the rules, they're probably breaking them in different ways rather than working together.

In a 51% attack, that assumption is broken as most, or at least enough of the network is overcome by bad actors who aim to rewrite reality in their favor. 

It's a real problem, one of the biggest blockchains face, especially less popular ones ... But even if you could pull one off, the outcome might not be as bad as many fear.

But what is actually at risk? What's possible and what's safe? Tune in to find out.

For more episodes and free early access before our regular releases, subscribe with Apple PodcastsSpotifyPocketcastsGoogle PodcastsCastboxStitcherRadioPublicaiHeartRadio or RSS.

Disclosure

Please note that our privacy policy, terms of use, cookies, and do not sell my personal information have been updated.

CoinDesk is an award-winning media outlet that covers the cryptocurrency industry. Its journalists abide by a strict set of editorial policies. CoinDesk has adopted a set of principles aimed at ensuring the integrity, editorial independence and freedom from bias of its publications. CoinDesk is part of the Bullish group, which owns and invests in digital asset businesses and digital assets. CoinDesk employees, including journalists, may receive Bullish group equity-based compensation. Bullish was incubated by technology investor Block.one.